Wafer vs. ultra thin vs. clear Drink Toppers
In this time-lapse, we test wafer paper vs. ultra-thin vs. clear toppers on watery, foam-free drinks at roughly 21.5 °C. See how each behaves so you can choose the right topper for display time and serving pace.
Observed longevity (from the video)
Topper type | Starts to curl / sink | Unreadable or fully sunk | Status at 16:22 | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Wafer Paper 0.27 mm | — | — | Floating & readable | Edges may soften; image intact. |
Wafer Paper 0.4 mm | — | — | Floating & readable | Stable on still water. |
Wafer Paper 0.6 mm | — | — | Floating & readable | Balanced stiffness and float. |
Wafer Paper 0.8 mm | ≈3:00 (minor ink bleed visible) | Not within first 16:22 | Floating & readable | Thickest wafer; very stable. |
Ultrathin 0.1 | ≈2:00 | ≈3:10–3:30 (gone by ~4:01) | Sunk | Great for quick reveals (2–4 min window). |
Clear 0.1 | ≈2:30 | ≈3:30–4:00 (gone by ~4:01) | Sunk | Elegant look; shortest window. |
What this means for your menu
- Photo booths & long displays: choose wafer paper (0.6–0.8 mm).
- Quick-serve cocktails / reveal moments: use ultrathin or clear toppers and serve immediately.
- Note: this test used still water with no foam; foam heads (e.g., cappuccino) typically extend float time.
Source: our timelapse test video (room-temp water, no foam) — watch on YouTube.